Law professor, an attorney admitted to practice in PA, was not liable for monetary damages in connection with alleged unauthorized practice of law and obtaining referral fee.

In this case of first impression before the Appellate Division, the Appellate Division reversed the trial court’s ruling which held that a law professor, an attorney admitted to practice in Pennsylvania, was liable for hundreds of thousands of dol Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu

In trade secrets dispute, award of attorneys fees as spoliation sanction was upheld for failure to preserve electronic records and suspend automatic deletion policies.

In a matter that touches on an ever-growing area of concern for trucking and transportation companies—identification and preservation of electronic materials as potential evidence—the defendant failed to comply with a preservation request, resulti Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu

Federal court interpretation finds plaintiff did not properly allege Uber was common carrier or negligent in hiring, retention, supervision of alleged sexual perpetrator. Did amply allege claims of negligent misrepresentation, deceptive trade practices.

The District Court was charged with evaluating the pleading sufficiency of numerous causes of action by a Jane Doe against Uber related to a physical and sexual assault allegedly suffered by Jane Doe at the hands of an Uber driver. Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu

Injuries from act of third party can be foreseeable consequence of failure to exercise care to prevent physical harm to others when rendering services and undertaking responsibility for safety of others.

In a matter that can be highly analogous to settings involving bus depots, vehicle lots and transportation hubs, the Delaware Supreme Court denied the Delaware State University’s (DSU) motion for summary judgment in a matter where six plaintiffs w Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu

In insurance coverage disputes, the only proper entity to bring suit against it is company underwriting subject insurance policy.

The plaintiffs sued Federal Insurance Company, Chubb INA Holdings, Inc. and Chubb Group Holdings, Inc. for denying business interruption coverage, even though Federal Insurance Company was the sole underwriter of the plaintiffs’ policy. Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu

Right to adequate medical care under 42 USC § 1983 is clearly established constitutional right when need is “obvious,” even if jail officer allows nurse to examine and nurse finds no serious medical need.

A detainee complained of knee pain and was visibly displaying difficulty standing. The jail officer had a nurse examine the detainee, and the nurse found no serious need for medical care. Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu