New Jersey Revises Jury Charge on Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice—Based on Case Handled by Jack Slimm and Jeremy Zacharias
Medical Malpractice Defense Verdict in a Complex Urosepsis Case
We secured a medical malpractice defense verdict in a complex urosepsis case where the damages included allegations of neurological sequelae and cognitive deficits. The trial was marked by aggressive cross-examination of expert witnesses and a deep dive into comprehensive neurological records and literature.
Marshall Dennehey’s Bill Gianaris Named Managing Attorney of the Firm’s Westchester County, NY Office
Marshall Dennehey Earns Four Finalist Honors in 2025 Pennsylvania Legal Awards
APPELLATE ATTORNEY ALLISON A. SNYDER JOINS MARSHALL DENNEHEY IN NEW YORK
MD Successfully Defends Low Verdict Against Insurance Broker that Plaintiff Challenged on Appeal
In a case where an insurance broker faced claims of professional negligence, Carol VanderWoude (Philadelphia) successfully defended the plaintiff’s appeal from a verdict obtained by Tim Ventura and Dana Gittleman (Philadelphia). The verdict against our client, an independent insurance broker, was well below the lost value of UIM coverage (i.e., $1 million), which the plaintiff sought to recover based on an alleged breach of the professional standard of care in failing to procure an endorsement for $ 1 million in UIM coverage on the plaintiff’s decedent’s commercial auto policy.