Publications
Vermont Continues Its Response to Department of Labor Data Breach
Last week, Vermont’s Department of Labor mailed out tens of thousands of tax forms to Vermont residents.
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin.
Can Testing Gene Mutations Help in Defending Mesothelioma Claims?
If you have ever watched television,
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin.
Pennsylvania Superior Court Reiterates Prevailing “Special Relationship” Standard: No Heightened Duty to Advise in Absence of “Confidential Relationship”
In Gemini Insurance Co. v. Meyer Jabara Hotels LLC, 213 A.3d 839 (Pa. Super. Apr.
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin.
In a Win for Insurers, the Florida Supreme Court Affirms that Carriers Are Bound Only By the Express Terms of the Contract
On January 21, 2021, the Florida Supreme Court rendered a decision in Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Manor House, LLC (No.
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin.
The Superior Court holds that the Board correctly ruled that the claimant was required to execute a Receipt stating that the work injury had resolved which is consistent with a prior Board decision.
This case came before the court on the claimant’s appeal from the Board’s decision which the claimant contended should be reversed since it conta
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
No competent or substantial evidence to support that employer/carrier only accepted the aggravation; therefore, they waived the ability to deny compensability. As such, the apportionment defense also fails, and full permanent impairment benefits were owed
The claimant appealed the Judge of Compensation Claims’ order, which apportioned impairment benefits and future medical treatment.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
The Appellate Division affirms dismissal of petitioner’s occupational exposure claims as being time-barred based on an assessment of the credibility of petitioner’s own testimony and petitioner’s reliance on the “net opinion” of his medical expert.
This Appellate Division decision addresses proof issues as to the statue of limitations in the context of occupational exposure claims.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi