New York Labor Law case dismissed on summary judgment.

Our client owned a parcel of land upon which a building was being erected. The plaintiff, an employee of a subcontractor, was at the premises cleaning up the worksite on a Saturday morning. He was standing on top of a company-owned work van in the parking lot, securing ladders to the roof of the van, when he slipped and fell off the van to the ground, sustaining serious leg and knee injuries. He underwent two knee surgeries and was also told he needed back surgery.

Unanimous defense jury verdict in one of the first Pennsylvania civil jury trials held during COVID-19 pandemic.

The verdict came within 30 minutes of deliberation in a five-day Bradford County PA fire-loss subrogation trial. Social distancing protocols were in place: all participants had their temperatures taken before entering the courthouse; jury selection took place at a local school auditorium; everyone in the courtroom was required to wear masks or face shields; and the jurors were spread out to the gallery section of the courtroom instead of the jury box. Witnesses could appear via Zoom.

Summary judgment in a construction accident case in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.

​Our client was the roofing contractor on a project in Philadelphia. The plaintiff was an employee of a subcontractor of our client. The plaintiff was injured when he fell through a skylight cutout in the roof. He fell approximately 15 feet and sustained injuries, including a broken hip (requiring ORIF) and fractured vertebra. The plaintiff was hospitalized for one month. The last settlement demand was $2.5 million.

Workers’ Compensation Office of Adjudication adjusts their policy for conducting live hearings in Pennsylvania.

As counties in Pennsylvania began entering the “green” phase at the end of June, the Workers’ Compensation Office of Adjudication (WCOA) adjusted their policy for conducting What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere

Although claimant may not have fully understood the contents or purpose of the employer’s W.C. claims forms, he made a false statement when he provided a fictitious social security number, thus his claim was denied.

In this misrepresentation case, the employer sent the claimant a form to complete at the onset of his claim. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere