Security Camera Video from Elementary School Had to Be Produced Pursuant to OPRA
In the recent case of Zezza v. Evesham Twp. Bd.
Legal Updates for New Jersey Public Entity & Civil Rights, J
Marshall Dennehey Announces New Office Managing Attorneys in Mount Laurel, NJ, and New York, NY
Marshall Dennehey announced today that Sharon A.
Defense verdict in premises liability case with well over seven-figures at stake.
We obtained a defense verdict following a 10-day jury trial on behalf of a national home improvement company and garden center, where the plaintiff’s demand was over seven figures. The plaintiff, a 79-year-old female, was using a rollator (walker) to assist her walking when she fell at a garden center. Plaintiff claimed that the front wheel of her rollator struck and got caught on the raised baseplate bolts of a column, causing her to fall. The plaintiff was taken out on a stretcher with a fractured leg that required ORIF surgery and a recommendation for future hip replacement.
Stephen R. Gross Joins Marshall Dennehey as Special Counsel in Fort Lauderdale
Marshall Dennehey, a leading civil defense litigation law firm with four offices in Florida, has added Stephen R. Gross as Special Counsel in its Fort Lauderdale office.
Third Circuit holds Uber drivers are not exempt from Federal Arbitration Act and are subject to binding arbitration.
The Third Circuit joined the First and Ninth Circuits in holding that Uber drivers are not exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and, therefore, are subject to binding arbitration.
Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.
The en banc Third Circuit concludes citizens with prior felony convictions for welfare fraud are among ‘the people’ protected by the Second Amendment.
In 1995, Bryan David Range pleaded guilty to one count of making a false statement to obtain food stamps in violation of Pennsylvania law and faced up to five years’ imprisonment. Following the conviction, Mr.
Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.
Plaintiffs lacked prudential standing to assert claims because their complaint alleged only damages suffered by non-party companies.
The district court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss in an action asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty and legal malpractice.
Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.