Publications
Once the carrier authorizes medical treatment, they are not obligated to accept claimant’s self-help physicians.
This case involved a work accident that was not initially reported to the carrier by the employer.
Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2020 is prepar
There is no entitlement to allow claimant’s attorney and a court reporter or videographer to attend examination with an authorized treating provider.
This case involves a compensable low back injury. The claimant requested a one-time change of physician, which the carrier authorized.
Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2020 is prepar
The nurse case manager did not meet the definition of a qualified rehabilitation provider; therefore, the motion for protective order was granted.
The claimant filed a motion for protective order, seeking to preclude the nurse case ma
Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2020 is prepar
Choice of Law Considerations Are Important When Considering Assignability: All1, LLC v. Pinnacle Insurance Solutions, LLC, 219 Westlaw 3072090, 219 N.J. Supr. LEXIS 1617 (N.J. App. 2019)
After Automotive Innovations suffered a fire loss at one of its locations, it discovered it had inadequate insurance coverage to cover its property losses and losses from th
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin.
Appellate Division Discusses Inter-Relationship Between Tort Claims Act and Malicious Prosecution
In Murphy v. Shaw, Docket No. A-3715-16T3, the Appellate Division provided guidance as to the accrual date for a malicious prosecution claim and the need to file a Tort Claims Notice.
Legal Updates for NJ Public Entity & Civil Rights - August 2019, has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin.