Although claimant may not have fully understood the contents or purpose of the employer’s W.C. claims forms, he made a false statement when he provided a fictitious social security number, thus his claim was denied.
In this misrepresentation case, the employer sent the claimant a form to complete at the onset of his claim. In return, the claimant provided a false social security number on the fraud statement and completed an authorization for the release of medical information and a work force innovation release form. The employer then asserted fraud and denied all benefits. The judge concluded that, while the claimant may not have fully understood the contents or purpose of the forms, he made a false statement when he provided the fictitious social security number and did so for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits. The claimant was barred from receiving any benefits.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We would be pleased to provide such legal assistance as you require on these and other subjects when called upon. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 Copyright © 2020 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints or inquiries, or if you wish to be removed from this mailing list, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.