Publications
Primarily because of the employer’s ownership and control of the availability and use of its trucks, the decedent driver of a tow truck was an employee at the time of his work-related fatality.
The decedent’s fiancé filed a fatal claim petition, alleging the decedent was working for the employer as a tow truck o
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide
What's Hot In Workers' Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide
Special Workers’ Compensation Alert - Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an important decision on May 13, 2021, in the matter of Mercer v.
What's Hot in Workers' Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
The Superior Court affirms the Board’s decision granting the termination petition and emphasizes that the employer need only show the claimant is capable of working and not that the injury has resolved.
This case came before the Superior Court on the claimant’s appeal from the Board’s decision granting the e
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
The workers’ compensation insurance policy cancellation was not valid because a condition precedent had not been met, and promissory estoppel applied because the employer relied on the certificate of insurance.
The claimant appealed and Jones Construction Co., the contractor, cross appealed the judge’s non-final ord
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
The Appellate Division affirms a Judge of Compensation’s decision to include the petitioner’s portion of attorneys’ fees and costs in the employer’s Section 40 lien.
In this per curiam decision, the Appellate Division reviews Section 40 of the workers’ compensation
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
Finding of disabling, work-related injury not based on impermissible speculation as judge believed claimant and found sufficient corroborative evidence in record to support testimony; employer entitled to credit for gross short-term disability benefits.
In this case, the claimant reported sustaining work-related injuries to her neck and back as a result of a
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
What's Hot In Workers' Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi