| Marshall Dennehey

The Commonwealth Court finding that combined dosages of OxyContin and Oxycodone were excessive and not reasonable and necessary was supported by substantial competent evidence as it was based on competent and credible opinion of reviewing provider.

August 1, 2022

Following the claimant’s work injury, the employer filed a Request for Utilization Review (UR) regarding pain management treatment the claima What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide informa

Appellate Division concludes judge relied on delays in litigation, prior to the entry of the order, to award maximum penalty.

Mount Laurel

Workers' Compensation

August 1, 2022

The petitioner was injured in a workplace incident on February 11, 2013. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp

Appellate Division affirms the grant of summary judgment for defendant and denial of plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment.

Mount Laurel

Workers' Compensation

August 1, 2022

An employee of one of New Town’s contractors was injured while working on one of the plaintiffs’ properties. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp

First District Court of Appeals finds compensability and no application of the “special hazard” exception or estoppel.

Jacksonville

Workers' Compensation

August 1, 2022

The claimant suffered an incomplete tetraplegia that resulted from a single-vehicle accident while riding home from work with What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp

Delaware Supreme Court affirms Superior Court’s decision regarding an IAB appeal holding that an employer may challenge medical treatment via petition for review if causation is in dispute.

Wilmington

Workers' Compensation

August 1, 2022

The claimant was injured in a work accident on April 4, 2011. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide informa

In Court: What’s New on the Medical Marijuana Front for Workers’ Compensation

Philadelphia - Headquarters

Workers' Compensation

August 8, 2022

July 28, 2022

The plaintiff in this legal malpractice action failed to produce an expert report by the deadline provided in the Legal Update for La

Subscribe to

The Commonwealth Court finding that combined dosages of OxyContin and Oxycodone were excessive and not reasonable and necessary was supported by substantial competent evidence as it was based on competent and credible opinion of reviewing provider.

Appellate Division concludes judge relied on delays in litigation, prior to the entry of the order, to award maximum penalty.

Appellate Division affirms the grant of summary judgment for defendant and denial of plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment.

First District Court of Appeals finds compensability and no application of the “special hazard” exception or estoppel.

Delaware Supreme Court affirms Superior Court’s decision regarding an IAB appeal holding that an employer may challenge medical treatment via petition for review if causation is in dispute.

In Court: What’s New on the Medical Marijuana Front for Workers’ Compensation

Marshall Dennehey Listed Among BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Listers

Sandy Caiazzo is Elevated to Director of Administrative Services at Marshall Dennehey

Marshall Dennehey Celebrates a Decade of Being Named One of the Philadelphia Region’s “Best Places to Work”

Summary judgment granted on legal malpractice action where plaintiff failed to timely produce an expert report.