Limitations to Expert Testimony
Key Points:
Plaintiff’s Failure to Identify Factual Causation Among Multiple Possible Defects Warrants Summary Judgment
Key Points:
On the Pulse…Other Notable Achievements
THOUGHT LEADERSHIP
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
PUBLISHED WORKS
RECOGNITION
Isn’t That Wunderly? How the Supreme Court’s Interpretation of the Mental Health Procedures Act Positively Impacts Treatment Providers
On October 23, 2025, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, reconfirmed the established reach of the immunity afforded by the Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA), once again noting that “medical treatment that is coincident to mental h
Q&A with Curi
To help understand the evolving landscape of medical malpractice, we spoke with the claims management team at Curi, a leader in health care risk and insurance solutions.
An Overview of the Protections Afforded by the Peer Review Protection Act
As scientific and medical advancements have accelerated, so has the complexity of medical decision-making, exposing a need for standardization in the United States. In 1952, the Joint Commission created the mandatory clinical peer review process.