Publications
Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that the compensation rate for specific loss benefits is controlled by Section 306(c) of the Act, not Section 306(a).
This case involved a claimant who crushed her arm in a pretzel machine while working for the employer. Eventually, she needed to have her right forearm amputated.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
Linda Wagner Farrell (Jacksonville, FL)
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
On the Pulse…Defense Verdicts and Successful Litigation Results*
HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT
CASUALTY DEPARTMENT
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY DEPARTMENT
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
Did the Cat Move the Ladder?
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
A Deadly Encounter: Court Clarifies Use of Force in Police Shooting of Mentally Ill Individual
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
Reimbursement of Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Lien Is Found Not Automatic by Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
A Double Take: Workers’ Compensation Liens Render UIM Non-Duplication Clauses Unenforceable
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
Change Is in the Air: A Shift in Pennsylvania Judge’s Role in Jury Selection Effective April 1, 2025
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
Adequate Notice Requires More Than the Delivery of a Policy
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.
A Carrier May Have No Duty to Defend an Intentional Injury Claim Against an Employer Arising from a New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Case
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No.