Publications
Gist of the action doctrine bars legal malpractice claim sounding in breach of contract when no breach of specific contractual promise is alleged.
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim sounding in breach of contract where the amende
Legal Update for La
Summary judgment granted on legal malpractice action where plaintiff failed to timely produce an expert report.
The plaintiff in this legal malpractice action failed to produce an expert report by the deadline provided in the
Legal Update for La
Third Party Business Associate Breaches Are Still a Major Concern for Health Care Providers
A recent report by Healthcare Info Security demonstrates the continued vulnerability health care providers have to data breaches tha
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey.
Federal District Court Comments on Fair Share Act’s Applicability in Cases Involving a “Faultless” Plaintiff in Light of Spencer v. Johnson
While clarification on the Fair Share Act in light of the Superior Court case of Spencer v.
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey.
Failure to Serve Tort Claims Notice by Third Party Plaintiff On a Third Party Defendant Is Fatal to Third Party Complaint
In McConnachie v. Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District (A-1380-20), the Appellate Division affirmed a decision by the trial court to dismiss a third party complaint for failure to timely serve a notice of tort claim.
The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey .
NJ Appellate Division addresses applicability of arbitration provisions in two separate decisions involving amusement parks.
First, in Matullo v. Skyzone Trampoline Park, the New Jersey appellate division addressed whether an arbitration provision contained in a participation agreement signed by a 15-year-old was enforceable.
Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July
PA Superior Court determines the “regular use” exclusion is unenforceable.
The plaintiff, a police detective, was driving a police car owned by his employer at the time of the incident. The plaintiff owned three personal vehicles on two insurance policies through Erie Insurance.
Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July
NY Supreme Court Appellate Division explains that failure to pay policy limits by insurance company does not constitute bad faith.
After the plaintiff was hit by a vehicle while crossing the street, she filed an action against the tortfeasor and settled the matter for the $25,000 policy limits.
Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July