The Commonwealth Court reversed a decision that had dismissed multiple parties from a workers’ compensation case.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
The Commonwealth Court affirmed a workers’ compensation judge’s award of penalties and counsel fees against an employer that failed to comply with multiple Fee Review Determinations.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
The Commonwealth Court has affirmed that a claimant who notifies their employer of a work injury in plain language and in a timely manner satisfies the notice requirements of Sections 311 and 312 of the Act even if a diagnosis is not immediately r
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
The Commonwealth Court has found that serial Petitions to Review may be permitted to add injuries, if they are of a different nature and even if the symptoms existed at the time a prior Petition to Review was litigated.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
In Brooks v. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, the Appellate Division upheld a workers’ compensation judge’s decision finding the petitioner 74% permanently disabled as a result of his custodial work for Rutgers.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
The New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed three trial court orders dismissing claims brought by James Weiss, a retired firefighter and employee of Altona Blower & Sheet Metal Works, who was seriously injured while installing a firefighter tra
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
The First District Court of Appeal reversed a compensation judge’s denial of indemnity benefits to a former employee who developed atrial fibrillation months after resigning from his job.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.
It is important to correctly calculate the average weekly wage (AWW) from the beginning of the claim. The AWW is the starting point for calculating the rate that is used to pay all non-medical benefits. The pertinent statute is 19 Del.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.