Publications

The Commonwealth Court has found that serial Petitions to Review may be permitted to add injuries, if they are of a different nature and even if the symptoms existed at the time a prior Petition to Review was litigated.  What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.

The Commonwealth Court has affirmed that a claimant who notifies their employer of a work injury in plain language and in a timely manner satisfies the notice requirements of Sections 311 and 312 of the Act even if a diagnosis is not immediately r What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.

The Commonwealth Court affirmed a workers’ compensation judge’s award of penalties and counsel fees against an employer that failed to comply with multiple Fee Review Determinations. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.

The Commonwealth Court reversed a decision that had dismissed multiple parties from a workers’ compensation case. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.

RESULTS* NEWS What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.

Jack Slimm and Jeremy Zacharias, of our Mount Laurel, New Jersey, office, secured a significant victory in the New Jersey Appellate Division in Cohen v. Weg & Meyers, P.C., A-2082-22 (App. Div. Aug. Legal Update for Lawyers’ Professional Liability – August 12, 2025, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developmen

Hospitals may once again be able to control where a patient brings a medical malpractice claim through a venue-selection agreement entered into with their patients.   Legal Updates for Health Care Liability - August 5, 2025

The claimant was injured at work on February 3, 2022, and began receiving total disability benefits. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.

The First District Court of Appeal issued an opinion that clarifies the extent of a Judge of Compensation Claim’s (JCC’s) discretion, and even jurisdiction, to review attorney fees and costs paid by employers/carriers. In Fox v. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 29, No.