Publications
Assignment of Benefits Contractor Precluded from Recovery Pursuant to Mortgagee Clause
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.
Delaware ‘Meet and Confer’ Rule Requires Human Contact??!
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.
The Credibility of Injured Workers and Experts Can Make or Break a Case
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.
The National Spotlight on Traumatic Brain Injuries and its Growing Prevalence in the Legal Industry
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.
Shoddy Home-Improvement Contracting? Grounds for Recovering Treble Damages and Attorneys Fees under Pennsylvania Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act and Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.
On the Horns of a Trial Dilemma: Addressing a Prior Conviction on Direct Examination or Waiving the Right to Contest the Admissibility on Appeal
Key Points:
Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.
Doubling Down: Two Third Circuit Decisions Reaffirm that Faulty Workmanship Does Not Constitute an “Occurrence” in Pennsylvania
In two separate decisions handed down last month, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals re-affirmed that, under Pennsylvania law, claims against contractors for faulty workmanship do not constitute an “occurrence” and are therefore not covered under
The material in Legal Updates for Insurance Services, June 1, 2023, has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey.
The Superior Court affirms a decision of the Industrial Accident Board that concluded Superior Court Civil Rule 41(a)(1)’s ‘Two Dismissal’ rule did not apply to an IAB proceeding.
The claimant was injured in a work accident on October 28, 2018.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
Regardless of whether a second opinion is reasonable or medically necessary, if a referral is made, it must be acknowledged within the applicable three or ten-day period or the defense of medical necessity is waived.
The claimant sought authorization of a second opinion, as recommended by the treating physician. The claimant conceded that the doctor ultimately testified that the second opinion was not medically necessary.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
The New Jersey Supreme Court affirms the Appellate Division’s decision to reverse the trial court and reinstate the jury verdict in the plaintiff’s favor.
In this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division’s decision to reverse the trial judge’s decision to vacate the jury verdict and award judgment to Marine Transport, Inc.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.