Publications
Isn’t That Wunderly? How the Supreme Court’s Interpretation of the Mental Health Procedures Act Positively Impacts Treatment Providers
On October 23, 2025, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, reconfirmed the established reach of the immunity afforded by the Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA), once again noting that “medical treatment that is coincident to mental h
NJ Appellate Division Affirms Dismissal in Legal Malpractice Action: A “Poster Child” for the Entire Controversy Doctrine and Res Judicata
On October 23, 2025, Jack Slimm and Jeremy Zacharias, of our Mount Laurel, NJ office, secured an important decision in the New Jersey Appellate Division on behalf of a law firm and its attorneys.
Legal Milestone: Entire Controversy Doctrine Shuts Down Securities Malpractice Appeal
Jack and Jeremy successfully defended an appeal arising out of a legal malpractice/securities action in which they were successful at the trial level.
Winning Streak Continues: Major Appellate Decision in DEP-Linked Malpractice Suit
Jack and Jeremy received their third successful Appellate Division decision within 30 days in a complex legal malpractice action. Frank Castella v.
U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Key Issue Regarding Freight Broker Liability
The federal circuits courts are divided on application of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA).
Legal Update for Trucking & Transportation Liabi