Publications
Judge denies claimant’s petition as the statute of limitations had run and agrees that a doctor visit and prescribed medication were unauthorized.
The employer asserted that the statute of limitations had run on the claimant’s 2011 work injury when the claimant fil
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
The judge finds that the claimant made false representations and holds entire claim was barred.
The claimant filed a petition seeking compensability of a hip and ankle injury.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
The Appellate Division affirms the dismissal of a third-party complaint filed by a general contractor seeking indemnification from its subcontractor for a tort action filed by the subcontractor’s injured employee.
In this decision involving the exclusive remedy provision of the New Jersey Workers’ Compens
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
The claimant failed to provide adequate notice that his stomach cancer was caused by his firefighting duties under § 311 of the Act and, therefore, his claim petition was properly dismissed.
The claimant began working as a volunteer firefighter for the employer in 2002.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
What's Hot in Workers' Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
The Board has the power to enforce an agreement to settle that is reached by commutation, despite the claimant passing away prior to execution of the commutation documents and their approval by the Board.
This case came before the Board on a motion filed by claimant’s counsel to enforce a commutation agreement between the
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
Court finds that failure to object on specificity grounds, where specificity would show ripeness, waives challenge to ripeness. IME opinions are admissible and can support claim for specific medical benefits.
The claimant appealed an order from Judge Winn denying right knee surgery.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
Disability must be established to a reasonable degree of medical certainty based on objective relevant medical findings. A judge may reject in whole or part uncontroverted testimony that he or she does not believe.
The claimant appealed the judge’s denial of temporary indemnity benefits for a specific period.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere
Appellate Division affirms a trial court’s dismissal of an employee’s tort action against his employer based on the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act.
In this per curiam decision, the Appellate Division affirmed a grant of summary judgment in
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of intere