Date range

Act 111, which enacted the Impairment Evaluation Provisions of Section 306(a.3) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, is applicable to injuries sustained prior to its effective date and is not an unlawful delegation of legislative authority.

In this case, the claimant sustained a work injury on February 12, 2006. Subsequently, an IRE was performed on September 5, 2008, and an impairment rating of 0% was given. What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.

Sanctions awarded after court determines insurer knew/should have known its improper venue defense was not supported by application of existing law to material facts where same clause had been determined ambiguous by District Court of Appeal.

This suit involved the defendant’s failure to pay the plaintiff’s claim for PIP benefits for treatment rendered to Mr. Rither. Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.

When confronted with evidence that defendant could have avoided accident, a finding that weather caused accident is inappropriate. Court also affirmed lower court’s ruling that strict adherence to specific city’s notice of claim form was not required.

The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident with a snowplow driver for the City of Kearney. Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers.