Publications
The language in the petition indicated a dispute was enough to justify the IME. The statute requires that there be a dispute before a party can obtain an IME.
The employer/carrier filed a motion to compel the claimant’s attendance at an independent medical examinat
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
The nurse can have ex parte communications with the doctor because the claimant acknowledged that she was an agent of the carrier.
This matter was before Judge Weiss on an evidentiary hearing after the claimant filed a motion for protect
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
The plain language of 440.15(e)(1) allows the employer to obtain a vocational assessment, and the change in attendant care after the PTD acceptance was a sufficient basis to trigger the employer/carrier’s right to a vocational assessment.
In this case before Judge Stanton in Gainesville, the employer/carrier filed a motion to compel a vocation
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
Supreme Court reverses Appellate Division’s decision (injury was not compensable as it occurred at an employer-sponsored social/recreational event), finding petitioner entitled to compensation as her role at the event was neither social nor recreational.
In this unanimous opinion, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed an Appellate Division’s decision—that the
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
Court addresses the retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Whitmoyer, holding an employer is required to reimburse medical payments as of the date Whitmoyer was decided, not as of date of a signed third-party settlement agreement.
In this case, the claimant sustained a severe injury while using a stone crusher that malfunctioned.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
What's Hot in Workers' Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
Superior Court affirms decision granting termination petition as being supported by substantial evidence and in so doing rejects claimant’s argument that the court should not defer to the Board’s credibility findings as the hearing was conducted virtually
This case came before the court on the claimant’s appeal from the Board’s decision granting the employer’s termination petition.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
Even though the claimant bore a wage loss to his temporary partial disability benefits due to a COVID-19 lay-off, he must still prove the work injury was a contributing causal factor to that wage loss.
This case is interesting because it involves a claim for temporary partial disability benefits relative to the COVID-19 pandemic.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi
The court finds that the judge erred by not ruling based on the notice that should have been provided within 52 weeks of the qualifying event versus when the symptoms manifested.
In the case of Andrew Wilkes v.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggi