Obtained summary judgment for a police officer accused of malicious prosecution. A municipal police officer received a complaint that an unknown male attempted to lure a 15-year-old female into his car. A day later, the victim and her mother went to the police department and advised the same officer that the victim saw the suspect car and followed it to a local business. When the driver exited the vehicle the victim viewed him and was adamant that he was the individual who had attempted to lure her into the same car the previous day. The officer prepared a photo array that contained a photograph of the owner of the vehicle which the victim immediately identified.  The officer obtained a warrant and arrested the suspect. At trial several months later , the criminal defendant produced cellular telephone evidence that he was some 35 miles away at the time that the alleged crime was committed. He was acquitted and subsequently sued the officer for malicious prosecution and a Fourteenth Amendment claim to be free from prosecution based upon false or fabricated evidence. Summary judgment was granted after the court “corrected” the affidavit of probable cause to the criminal complaint and determined that “no reasonable jury could find facts that would lead to the conclusion that the reconstructed affidavit lacked probable cause."