Attorney Profile
Stuart H. Sostmann
Areas of Practice
Contact Info
Overview
With over two decades of experience as a litigator, Stuart concentrates his practice in the area of commercial general liability. He routinely handles high exposure matters in the fields of product liability, premises liability, auto liability, construction litigation, marine liability, dram shop and commercial litigation. This includes cases involving personal injuries and property damage claims.
As the Managing Attorney of the firm's third-largest office, Stuart oversees the daily operations, including the supervision of 75 employees. In addition to his managerial duties, Stuart serves as the Casualty Supervisor, where he ensures that all client matters are handled promptly, professionally, and effectively by the team of attorneys.
In his career, Stuart has represented manufacturers, suppliers and retailers in product liability matters, including electronics, medical equipment, food products, appliances, farm equipment, plumbing equipment, power tools, toys and sports and recreational equipment. He frequently represents property owners, retailers, pharmacies, general contractors, subcontractors and utilities in premises liability litigation. He has tried numerous cases to verdict in counties throughout Western Pennsylvania.
A significant portion of Stuart’s practice has been devoted to construction litigation. These cases are highly complex and require deep industry knowledge and experience. Stuart has handled a wide range of construction injury and defect cases, representing contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers, engineers, architects, and other construction professionals throughout Pennsylvania. His experience includes defending against claims involving construction defects such as water intrusion from faulty roofing or window and door seals, cracked foundations or improper waterproofing, structural and design issues, mold intrusion, drywall defects, and soil subsidence, heaving, or movement.
Stuart attended the University of Pittsburgh graduating with a B.A. in Political Science. He then attended the University of Pittsburgh School of Law where he participated in the Appellate Moot Court Program, Student Bar Association and the Health Law Certificate Program. He obtained his juris doctor from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.
Stuart currently serves on the Marshall Dennehey Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee working to improve the recruitment, retention and advancement of diverse attorneys and professionals. He is the former President of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute, an organization of civil defense attorneys, executives of insurance companies and self-insured corporations. Stuart is also a member of the Allegheny County Bar Association and the Academy of Trial Lawyers of Allegheny County. Among his many honors, he is Rated AV® Preeminent™ by LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell and is recognized among the Best Lawyers in America for his work in product liability litigation. Stuart is additionally recognized as Pennsylvania Super Lawyer.
Results
Obtained a defense verdict following a three-day jury trial in a slip and fall injury case. The plaintiff slipped in the lobby of a commercial building and claimed a serious and ongoing injury to her right shoulder. Plaintiff alleged she fell due to a wet floor caused by the facilities management’s cleaning process and the lack of sufficient visible wet floor caution signs. Plaintiff underwent two surgeries, claimed ongoing pain and suffering, and sought $500,000 prior to trial. We represented the building ownership and the facilities management company. Problematic for the defense was the lack of a surveillance video of the incident, photographs of the lobby contemporaneous to the incident, or an incident report. Despite this, we persuaded the jury to find for the Defense by establishing a consistent and credible history of habitual practice in the placement of wet floor signs across the lobby in highly visible areas. We also won the credibility battle through our well-prepared witnesses. Although faced with a sympathetic plaintiff with a substantiated history of medical treatment, we succeeded by presenting the case using “old school” personal injury defense tactics that were necessary due to the lack of video, photographs, and documentation.
Successfully argued a precedent-setting case in the Pennsylvania Superior Court where a waiver of subrogation clause in a construction contract was applied to building damages caused by a windstorm three years after the project was completed.
Successfully defended a product installer at trial in a single vehicle accident, where the placement of the product in the vehicle was claimed to be the cause of the crash at high speed. A defense verdict was obtained after a 5 day jury trial where the demand was $800,000 prior to trial.
Thought Leadership
AI in the Legal Profession, Marshall Dennehey Client Presentation, September 2024
Civil Litigation State of Affairs – The Impact of COVID-19 in Pennsylvania and New Jersey & What’s Next, Marshall Dennehey Client Webinar, May, 2021
An Overview of Construction Defect Litigation in Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 16, 2014
Commercial Defense Practice in New York, New Jersey & Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 5, 2014
Brief Overview of Pennsylvania Contractual Indemnity and Additional Insured Issues, Nationwide Insurance Company, April 2012
Discoverability and Proper Use of Claim Notes, Berkley Mid-Atlantic, October 2011
“Yes! Waivers of Liability for Recreational Activities Are Still Effective in Pennsylvania,” Defense Digest, Vol. 23, No. 1, March 2017
"Timing Is Everything, Even for Bad Faith Claims," Defense Digest, Vol. 6, No. 1, February 2000