Attorney Profile
Michael C. Mongiello
Areas of Practice
Contact Info
Overview
Mike is the supervising attorney of the Health Care Department in the firm's Camp Hill office. In this position, he manages multiple attorneys, paralegals and staff.
Mike focuses his practice on the defense of complex medical professional liability and medical professional licensing/disciplinary matters. With nearly three decades of experience, he has represented a broad spectrum of facility and individual health care providers, including hospitals, medical practices, physicians, midlevel providers, correctional health care providers, and allied health professionals. Mike also regularly defends medical professionals in disciplinary and licensure matters and advises clients on risk reduction and loss mitigation practices. In addition, he handles matters relating to behavioral health liability.
Mike has consistently achieved favorable results through dispositive motion practice, alternative dispute resolution and formal hearing or trial. He is committed to zealous representation of his clients and prides himself on conducting detailed investigations, effective communication and passionate advocacy.
During law school, Mike chose to focus his legal career on health care defense. Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, he practiced at a Harrisburg area law firm for several years and gained significant experience in this highly specialized practice area. Mike graduated cum laude from Widener University School of Law and was awarded a Certificate of Achievement in Advocacy and served as a student mentor. He completed his undergraduate degree at the University of Scranton, where he graduated magna cum laude in criminal justice and was inducted into Alpha Phi Sigma, the National Criminal Justice Honor Society.
When not practicing law, Mike enjoys music, everything outdoors, boating on Lake Wallenpaupack, motor/water sports, skiing, cooking, vegetable gardening and spending time with his wife and two children. He is also a talented winemaker, carrying on a tradition that his father started upon immigrating to the United States from Italy.
Results
Secured a significant victory before the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services on behalf of a home health nurse who had been found responsible for child abuse. The case stemmed from the alleged attack of a child-patient by a family pit bull during home nursing care, where it was asserted that the nurse failed to properly supervise and protect the child and did not respond appropriately to the incident. After a three-day hearing, we successfully appealed the determination by establishing that there was no definitive proof the nurse left the child unsupervised, raising questions about whether the dog had any history of aggression, and identifying credibility issues with the family’s testimony. Medical experts also offered alternate explanations for the child’s injuries. Ultimately, the court ordered the expungement of the nurse’s child abuse record. This outcome also created a path to a very favorable resolution of the related civil matter.
Obtained partial summary judgment for an obstetrician in a medical professional liability action, significantly curtailing his client’s exposure. The case arose out of the alleged negligent delivery of a baby, resulting in a shoulder dystocia, right brachial plexus injury and Erb’s palsy. Michael argued that there was a lack of evidence that his client improperly applied traction during the delivery and the judge agreed, granting partial summary judgment on the plaintiff’s gravamen claim of direct negligence. The court also granted summary judgment on claims for res ipsa loquitur and failure to obtain informed consent, and also as to plaintiff’s claim for past medical expenses, due to a lack of proper evidence in support of these claims.
Secured summary judgment on behalf of orthopedic surgeon client based on the statute of limitations despite plaintiff’s claimed application of the discovery rule. After conducting written discovery and deposing plaintiff to solidify that the medical professional liability action was untimely commenced, Michael early filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in an effort to avoid the incurrence of significant additional expense in defending the case through the remainder of the discovery process. At oral argument, the presiding judge commented that the matter was “extraordinarily briefed” and “even better presented.” Michael’s success on the timeliness issue, which is almost always reserved for decision by the jury, brought a quick end to the litigation, in which there were significant liability concerns.
Convinced a Commonwealth Department of State Prosecuting Attorney to voluntarily withdraw a Show Cause Order filed against a veterinary pharmacy, by which reciprocal discipline was sought to be imposed against its professional license. The matter arose out of an egregious pharmaceutical compounding error which caused the death of two race horses. Successfully advocated that due to a subsequent change of ownership, staff and processes, reciprocal discipline was unwarranted and unfair.
Thought Leadership
Malpractice Risks of Health Care Communication Failures, presented to medical staff of a large health care provider, March 9, 2021
Social Media Update: Discoverability, Admissibility and Jury Strategy, Marshall Dennehey Health Care and Health Law Seminar, November 9, 2017
The Nuts and Bolts of Defending Correctional Healthcare Claims," Jersey City, New Jersey, April 2014
Documentation: A Matter of Life/Death, Liability & Livelihood, Mechanicsburg, PA, August 2013
Augmentation of Recordkeeping Through Social Media: The New Frontier, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, August 2013
Documentation: A Matter of Life/Death, Liability & Livelihood, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, May 2013
The Best Defense is a Good Offense: Medical Documentation, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, May 2012
Informed Consent: Nursing Concerns, Lebanon, Pennsylvania, May 2012
Most Common Claims Arising Out of Correctional Healthcare in Federal and Pennsylvania Courts, Dallas, Texas, April 2011
"I'm Sorry. Mitigating Factor or Fodder for Suit?," Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 1, March 2012
"Can Medical Professional Corporations Be Held Responsible Under Thompson v. Nason Hospital for Direct Corporate Negligence?," Counterpoint, The Pennsylvania Defense Institute, January 2001