Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds that a Low-Speed Electric Scooter Does Not Qualify Its User as a “Pedestrian” for the Purposes of the No-Fault Law

Commercial trucking and transportation companies are often required to pay for medical and lost wage benefits pursuant to state no-fault laws, even when they are arguably not at fault for an incident due to specific definitions in state no-fault statutes. The plaintiff in this matter was aboard a standard electric scooter with “two wheels connected by a floorboard, as well as handlebars, a headlight, brake light, and speedometer.” The key issue in this matter was clearly the court’s analysis of the rechargeable electric motor. The court ultimately held that, since the scooter itself was a “vehicle propelled by other than muscular power,” it met the low-speed scooter definition and rejected the argument that the scooter could be likened to a bicycle. The court further noted that the text of the Act and the legislative history suggested that electric scooter riders should not be considered pedestrians for the purposes of no-fault benefits and affirmed the rulings rejecting the plaintiff’s petition. 

_{Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2024 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2024 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.}