Case Law Alerts
Request for a second opinion medical examination does not give rise to a claim of interference under the FMLA.
The plaintiff suffered from Rheumatoid Arthritis and alleged both retaliation and interference claims under the FMLA. The plaintiff alleged that the employer’s request for a second opinion medical examination constituted interference and/or, alternatively, that such an examination is only allowed upon a showing of a “reasonable” basis to question the initial medical certification. In rejecting these arguments, Judge Kugler noted that the statute vested the employer with significant discretion to decide whether a medical certification was necessary and sufficient. In any case where the employer has reason to doubt the validity of a certification, it may require, at its expense, that the employee obtain the opinion of a second health care provider designated by the employer. The court specifically noted that no “reasonableness” requirement existed in the statute.
Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2019
Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2019 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.