Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed judgment on the pleadings in legal malpractice case based upon statute of limitations.

The plaintiffs alleged the court erred in not allowing them to amend their pleadings to clarify facts regarding equitable tolling and erred in not recognizing that issues of fact existed. The trial court found, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court agreed, that without regard for an email from counsel which the plaintiffs believed was deceptive, the plaintiffs knew of its alleged harm when they entered into a consent decree with the Department of Justice.

_{Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2023 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.}