Attorney received a favorable decision in a case in which the petitioner alleged that she either developed or had exacerbated her underlying bipolar disorder as a result of being treated unfairly by her supervisor

Attorney received a favorable decision in a case in which the petitioner alleged that she either developed or had exacerbated her underlying bipolar disorder as a result of being treated unfairly by her supervisor. Following a full trial, the judge ruled that the petitioner not only failed to satisfy the burden of proof as outlined in Goyden v. State Judiciary (the controlling case for workers' compensation cases in New Jersey involving allegations of psychiatric disability) but also there was no showing that the supervisor acted in any manner inconsistent with the supervisor's authority.  The judge in her decision cited to the attorney’s cross examination of both the petitioner and petitioner's medical expert in reaching her decision.