Date range

A self-insured employer is not entitled to subrogation against third party settlement for benefits the claimant received during time he was receiving his full salary under the Heart and Lung Act.

In its appeal to the Commonwealth Court, the employer maintained that it was entitled to subrogation to the extent of the compensation payable under the Workers’ Compensation Act, not withstanding the claimant’s concurrent receipt of H Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2018

The heightened reckless standard to prove liability against participants in recreational sport activities also applies to recreational sport practice. Whether an individual acted recklessly is a question of fact to be determined by the fact finder.

The plaintiff brought suit for injuries sustained when he was struck in the face by a golf club while watching a demonstration on how to hit a golf ball. Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2018

An insured cannot recover both underinsured and uninsured benefits from the same policy as 18 Del. C. 3902 includes an underinsured motorist within the definition of “uninsured.”

The insured was injured in a three-car accident. One of the vehicles was underinsured, while the other was uninsured. State Farm tendered the $100,000 UM/UIM policy limit to satisfy the insured’s claim against the uninsured motorist. Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2018