Date range

As a matter of first impression, the Commonwealth Court held that the Philadelphia Parking Authority failed to comply with proper administrative procedure in accordance with the Commonwealth documents law in enforcing a taxi cab regulation.

An inspector for the Authority encountered one of the cab company's taxicabs while it was dropping off a passenger and noted that the inspection sticker had expired, both front tires were bald, and the right rear door was missing its rubber g Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010

As a matter of first impression, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an insured's recovery under UM/UIM policies may be offset under 75 PA.C.S. §1722 by group/program/arrangement benefits, including disability benefits purchased.

Following an automobile accident, the insured-driver received income-loss benefits under a group plan, paid by his employer, and benefits under two personal disability policies that were purchased privately. Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010

The Third Circuit holds that the Americans with Disabilities Act contemplated that employers may need to make reasonable shift changes in order to accommodate a disabled employee's disability-related difficulties in getting to work.

In Colwell, the plaintiff brought suit against her former employer, alleging that she was constructively discharged in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") after her store manager failed to allow her to work exclusive Case Law Alert - 3rd Qtr 2010