Date range

Treating physician’s testimony that he would not have changed his course of treatment had defendant physician met the standard of care is inadmissible at trial and will not insulate defendant from liability for negligence.

The plaintiff developed back and leg pain, as well as numbness and weakness in his hands and fingers. His treating neurologist performed an MRI of the lumbar spine, but not the cervical spine. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2014

A physician cannot insulate himself from liability for negligence by relying on a subsequent treating physician’s testimony that adequate care by the defendant physician would not have altered the subsequent care.

The Florida Supreme Court resolved a split among the District Courts of Appeal on an issue of causation in medical malpractice cases. The plaintiff was treated by a series of physicians. Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2014