Date range

General denials by a legal malpractice plaintiff are insufficient to warrant denial of the defendants’ detailed and well-supported motion for summary judgment.

In their second motion for summary judgment and on appeal, the defendants successfully asserted that they explained the ramifications of a stock restriction or advised against the settlement proposals because the value of the plaintiffs’ stock wou Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2015

An attorney may still owe a duty, as a matter of law, to explain unambiguous business terms in a written agreement even when the client is a sophisticated businessperson who negotiated the terms of the agreement himself.

While it is clear that an attorney owes a client a duty of care, as a matter of law, arising from their attorney-client relationship, the Appellate Court reversed the grant of summary judgment for the defendants where genuine factual disputes exis Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2015

A law firm partner in an LLP does not lose his liability protection if the LLP fails to obtain or maintain professional liability insurance as required by Rule 1:21-1C(a)(3).

The defendant partner successfully argued that he is shielded from liability as a partner in a limited liability partnership (LLP) and is not vicariously liable for the alleged legal malpractice of his former partner despite the LLP’s failure to p Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2015