Attorneys secured a termination of workers' compensation benefits in favor of the employer which was affirmed by the Commonwealth Court. At the employer's prompting, the court held that the claimant had waived her primary argument that the judge failed to recognize additional injuries from which she had not recovered as established by a prior termination proceeding in which her expert was held credible, because she did not raise this in her appeal form to the Board. The court also held that the employer's medical expert's testimony that claimant was fully recovered from her work injury and that no objective findings supported her subjective complaints, constituted the necessary change of condition testimony to meet employer's burden of proof on termination.