Summary judgment stands from claim of woman struck by an errant baseball at her son’s game.

Summary judgment was properly granted when the plaintiff’s expert failed to identify an objective standard for when a ball field is dangerous for purposes of the Tort Claims Act. The “net opinion” rule forbids admission of the expert’s report. The plaintiff could not establish a prima facie case that the failure to protect her from an errant throw through the use of higher fences was palpably unreasonable.

_{Case Law Alerts, 2^nd Quarter, April 2015}

_{Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2015 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.}