Failure to preserve issues on appeal.

The Superior Court agreed with the trial court that the plaintiff failed to preserve any issues on appeal where his concise statement filed pursuant to Pa. R. App. P. 1925(a) was impermissibly vague and mere boilerplate.

_{Case Law Alerts, 2^nd Quarter, April 1, 2016}

_{Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2016 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.}