Attorney prevailed on a motion for summary judgment requiring co-defendant to take over the defense of our insured

Attorney prevailed on a motion for summary judgment requiring co-defendant to take over the defense of our insured. The insured, a Christmas tree farmer, entered into a lease agreement with a hunting club allowing them to hunt on the farm in exchange for the club performing work. The agreement also required the club to obtain insurance and add the farmer as an additional insured. Plaintiff was injured when he caught his finger in a log splitting machine while performing the required work on the farm. The club's carrier fought the request to take over the defense based on language in the lease agreement indicating coverage came into play for incidents "arising out of the use of the land." It was their argument that the agreement contemplated coverage only for incidents related to hunting. We argued that the policy was clear on its face naming our farmer as an additional insured and that the lease agreement constituted parole evidence which need not be considered since there were no ambiguous terms in the insurance contract. The Judge agreed and ordered that the club take over the defense of the insured.  After prevailing on the motion for the club to take over our defense we filed a motion seeking reimbursement of defense costs incurred. The motion was hotly contested, however we ultimately prevailed and the Judge ordered co-defendant to reimburse our defense costs.