Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Property Litigation

There are few areas of the insurance industry that involve such direct and personal contact with insureds in their time of need than first party claims that arise out of homeowner and commercial property policies. Unfortunately, there are few areas of insurance claims that generate more complaints and litigation. Even when an insurance company handles first party property claims faultlessly and fairly, it is an unfortunate inevitability that some litigation will result.

The direct and personal contact with the insureds, the complex nature of the policies at issue, the limitless number of claims scenarios, combined with the ever-increasing percentage of insureds represented by public adjusters, make this area of insurance claims ripe for lawsuits. When other unique areas of dispute – such as appraisal, matching and replacement cost – are considered, sometimes during catastrophe (CAT) operations, the importance of having legal counsel concentrating his or her practice in property litigation cannot be underestimated.

Our Property Litigation Practice Group is very familiar with these issues and the state of the law as it pertains to first party matters and bad faith. Marshall Dennehey's Property Litigation Practice Group maintains a synergistic relationship with our Insurance Coverage/Bad Faith and Fraud/ Special Investigative Litigation Practice Groups. These relationships allow our attorneys to coordinate their efforts and stay current relative to these overlapping areas of practice.

Our services go beyond representation after a lawsuit is filed and include:

  • Coordinating counsel services;
  • Pre-litigation commercial and residential claims consultation, including such issues as business interruption, extra expense, profit and overhead, “matching” and appraisal;
  • Drafting reservation of rights and coverage position letters;
  • Drafting property coverage opinion letters;
  • Regulatory consultation and responding to insurance department complaints and inquiries;
  • Examinations Under Oath to clarify facts and coverage;
  • Training of management and staff;
  • Selection of vendors;
  • Assistance in developing claims protocols; and
  • Assistance in drafting new and revising existing policy language.

 

Included in the Property Litigation Practice Group are attorneys who, prior to law school, worked as property claims representatives. These attorneys bring experience in property damage estimation, contents evaluation and public adjuster representation. They possess a unique perspective that enables them to advise and assist the claims professional both before and after litigation.

We welcome the opportunity to be of service to you. We are available to discuss any property claims issues, as well as give presentations or lectures at your location or at any one of our regional offices.

Oct 27, 2011
Attorney obtained dismissal of his client on 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss upon claims by her neighbor that an "illegal garage" constructed on her property impinged on Township set-back requirements, was constructed without the necessary permits and...
May 16, 2011
Attorneys received an affirmed dismissal of all claims against the insured. Plaintiff had attended a yard sale held by the insured and the insured’s mother at the home of the grandmother for the insured. Plaintiff parked his car on a highway...
Mar 29, 2010
Attorneys obtained Summary Judgment on behalf of homeowners who were sued by the estate of a pedestrian who was struck by a vehicle. Plaintiff's decedent was on the Defendants' property looking at a snow blower set out "for sale." While returning...
Jun 16, 2009
Attorneys obtained dismissal of a Verified Petition brought by five condominium unit owners against a condominium association seeking to compel pre-suit disclosure of an extensive and onerous volume of records based on possible allegations of...
Jun 1, 2009
Attorneys obtained summary judgment on behalf of a Township.  Plaintiff owns a dental practice on property that contains a large underground drainage pipe that runs between two concrete culverts owned by PennDOT.  The Plaintiff alleged that the...
Feb 13, 2009
Attorney obtained summary judgment on behalf of the individual members of a condominium's board of trustees. Plaintiff's condominium unit suffered extensive interior water damage when an upstairs unit owner's washing machine failed. In addition to...
Aug 25, 2008
Attorney obtained a defense verdict in a jury trial on behalf of defendant camping organization. Defendant was sued by two railroad conductors/engineers who sustained serious injury when their train collided with a large tree which had fallen from...
May 20, 2008
Attorney obtained dismissal of homeowners sued for an allegedly dangerous condition (defective staircase) even though accident occurred six months after sale to current owner. Plaintiff was a furnace repairman hired by the current owners and was...
Apr 28, 2008
Attorneys obtained dismissal of Plaintiff's claims in a surface water incursion case commenced by Plaintiff against uphill landowners in two different housing developments and against the local township. Defense attorney obtained dismissal of...
Defense Digest Article December 1, 2012
  Key Points: Residential homeowners in New Jersey are not liable for negligent maintenance of abutting sidewalks, unless they have created a dangerous condition. Condominium associations may..., Defense Digest, Vol. 18 No. 4, December 2012
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2012
The endless claims scenarios, coupled with face-to-face contact and helping insureds through difficult times, are part of what makes property claims so challenging and rewarding. Unfortunately, more and more insureds and their representatives view..., Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2012
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2012
Key Points: Maryland's highest court concludes that pit bulls and cross-bred pit bulls are "inherently dangerous" animals. Under new standard, owners of pit bulls, landlords and property owners are strictly liable for the..., Defense Digest, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 2012
Law Alerts April 1, 2012
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the Delaware common law rule in premises liability cases that property owners/possessors must refrain from willful and wanton conduct toward trespassers and licensees. The plaintiff was riding his bicycle through the..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2012

Chair

James H. Cole
Chair, Fraud/Special Investigation Practice Group; Chair, Property Litigation Practice Group
(267) 880-2026
jhcole@mdwcg.com

Co-Chair

Howard P. Dwoskin
Assistant Director, Casualty Department
(215) 575-2664
hpdwoskin@mdwcg.com

Related Practice Areas

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."