Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Professional Liability

The growth, tenacity and creativity of the plaintiffs' bar has ushered in a new wave of matters sounding in professional liability. To meet the needs of our clients, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin has responded with a team of lawyers devoted exclusively to defending professionals. Our professional liability practice is broad-based and includes many senior attorneys who have significant experience in the defense of large exposure, politically-sensitive and complex cases. An analysis committee examines each case to ensure its proper assignment within our group.
 
Our Professional Liability Practice Group services a broad client base, including, but not limited to:

  • Abstractors
  • Accountants
  • Actuaries
  • Architects
  • Brokers/Dealers
  • Clergy
  • Debt collectors
  • Engineers
  • Financial planners
  • Financial professionals
  • Financial services outsourcing solution providers
  • Information technology advisors
  • Insurance brokers/agents
  • Investment advisors
  • Investment professionals
  • Lawyers
  • Mediators
  • Mortgage brokers
  • Mutual fund and hedge fund administrators
  • Private trust companies
  • Real estate agents and brokers
  • Stockbrokers
  • Title agents
  • Travel agents

 
We also defend fiduciary liability matters, corporate directors and officers, and ERISA claims. In addition to professional liability matters before state and federal courts, we defend financial planners, investment professionals, and brokers and broker-dealers before self-regulatory organizations (SROs). We also handle securities arbitration claims before FINRA, AAA and other SROs. In addition, the group litigates commercial matters including employment disputes, trade secrets, bank litigation, and surety, fidelity and performance bonds.
 
Our offices are centrally linked by state-of-the-art computer networking. Our clients realize added value from our extensive network of offices: travel time is sharply reduced and the attorneys working out of these offices and living in these respective areas are intimately familiar with local practice and enjoy a good rapport with the judges before whom they frequently appear.
 
Recognizing the need for a cost-effective approach to the defense of professionals, our firm is dedicated to providing our clients with quality, timely and economical service. We are on the cutting edge in developing innovative and alternative billing practices.
 
The Professional Liability Practice Group serves clients in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ft. Lauderdale and communities throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Florida and New York.
 
We would welcome the opportunity to work with you in handling your professional liability litigation. We are also available to conduct presentations or training seminars at your location, or at one of our eighteen offices. 

Pages

Jan 12, 2009
Attorneys obtained a defense verdict in a complex legal malpractice case. Plaintiff, an insurance agency, alleged that our attorney client failed to timely prosecute its third-party beneficiary contract claim against a reinsurer who allegedly put...
Dec 10, 2008
Attorney obtained a dismissal of a slander claim against the Board of Directors of an orthodox Jewish congregation. Defense attorney moved for a dismissal on the pleadings, arguing that the court's involvement in the case would violate the...
Dec 10, 2008
Attorney obtained summary judgment in a complex legal malpractice case involving a high value real estate deal. Defendant represented one of the buyers. After the deal fell through, defendant filed suit against the sellers and their attorneys, and...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorneys succesffully defended an alleged legal malpractice action in which plaintiff filed suit against her former attorney, who had represented Plaintiff in several separate and distinct legal matters over the course of nearly two years,...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorney prevailed on a Rule 12 Motion, resulting in the dismissal of Plaintiffs' complaint against a mortgage broker. Plaintiffs were first-time home buyers and purchasers of new construction residential property. Plaintiffs claimed the mortgage...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorneys obtained summary judgment and dismissal with prejudice of a complex legal malpractice action. Plaintiff was the sole shareholder of a national trucking company that owned and/or leased approximately 300 trucks and employed over 75 full-...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorneys won summary judgment on all claims against a security company that employed a security guard in a public school. The security guard began a romantic and sexual relationship with a fourteen year old female student, culminating in the girl...
Sep 22, 2008
Attorneys received a defense verdict in a binding, non-appealable, multi-day arbitration. Claimant alleged that a national broker dealer client defamed him by maliciously reporting the basis for his termination from the firm and sought a...
Sep 15, 2008
Attorneys obtained summary judgment dismissal of all counts and claims in a legal malpractice action where the plaintiff claimed her divorce attorney negligently failed to include a prayer for alimony in a motion for default judgment resolving all...
Jul 21, 2008
Attorneys received Summary Judgment for an insured in a seller's disclosure case on behalf of the home inspector on the basis of a specific one year statute of limitations in the home inspection law. Prior counsel had failed to plead any statue of...

Pages

Pages

Law Alerts October 1, 2012
The plaintiffs Mabel and Cris Smith, mother and son, filed a professional negligence claim against two lawyers, Gerald Morrison and Scott Morrison, claiming that the attorneys breached their fiduciary duties to Mabel and Cris by simultaneously..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2012
Law Alerts April 1, 2012
The plaintiff resolved a property dispute with her ex-husband and entered into a settlement agreement with a reservation of rights to sue her former attorney for legal malpractice. In placing the settlement on the record, the plaintiff stated that..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2012
Law Alerts April 1, 2012
After the commercial condominium suffered flood damage when a pipe burst in the building's air conditioning system, the Association passed a special assessment to pay for flood damage repairs and cleaning of the air conditioning system's..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2012
Law Alerts April 1, 2012
Unlike res judicata, which applies to subsequent actions between the same parties on the same cause of action, the law of the case doctrine is triggered when successive appeals are taken in the same case. The law of the case doctrine holds that the..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2012
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2012
Maryland – Civil Practice/Assumption of the Risk Key Points: Maryland’s highest court has overturned past precedent concerning application of the defense of assumption of the risk to snow and ice slip and fall cases....
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2012
Florida – Professional Liability Key Points: Florida’s Third District held that professionals could not, as a matter of law, contractually limit their liability for professional services. Accordingly, Florida...
Law Alerts January 1, 2012
The issue in this appeal is whether the Correctional Medical Services ("CMS") is an entity entitled to the protection of the Affidavit of Merit statute ("AOM statute"). The plaintiff filed AOM for the individual doctors but not..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2012
Law Alerts January 1, 2012
Typically, the measure of damages for breach of contract claims includes consequential damages to the extent such damages were reasonably foreseeable and contemplated by the parties at the time the contract was entered into. The trial court in this..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2012
Defense Digest Article December 1, 2011
Pennsylvania – Attorney Liability , Key Points: Liability for aiding and abetting a breach of a fiduciary duty has never been imposed on an attorney in Pennsylvania who merely provided legal representation to his client. Pennsylvania courts have not expressly precluded..., Defense Digest, Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2011
Law Alerts October 1, 2011
In July 2003, La Costa Beach Resort Condominium Association, Inc. (La Costa) brought suit against three directors of the timeshare condominium for breach of fiduciary duty. After the verdict, the directors moved for a new trial and brought a..., Case Law Alert - 4th Qtr 2011

Pages

Chair

Christopher E. Dougherty
Director - Professional Liability Department
(215) 575-2733
cedougherty@mdwcg.com

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."