Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Professional Liability

The growth, tenacity and creativity of the plaintiffs' bar has ushered in a new wave of matters sounding in professional liability. To meet the needs of our clients, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin has responded with a team of lawyers devoted exclusively to defending professionals. Our professional liability practice is broad-based and includes many senior attorneys who have significant experience in the defense of large exposure, politically-sensitive and complex cases. An analysis committee examines each case to ensure its proper assignment within our group.
 
Our Professional Liability Practice Group services a broad client base, including, but not limited to:

  • Abstractors
  • Accountants
  • Actuaries
  • Architects
  • Brokers/Dealers
  • Clergy
  • Debt collectors
  • Engineers
  • Financial planners
  • Financial professionals
  • Financial services outsourcing solution providers
  • Information technology advisors
  • Insurance brokers/agents
  • Investment advisors
  • Investment professionals
  • Lawyers
  • Mediators
  • Mortgage brokers
  • Mutual fund and hedge fund administrators
  • Private trust companies
  • Real estate agents and brokers
  • Stockbrokers
  • Title agents
  • Travel agents

 
We also defend fiduciary liability matters, corporate directors and officers, and ERISA claims. In addition to professional liability matters before state and federal courts, we defend financial planners, investment professionals, and brokers and broker-dealers before self-regulatory organizations (SROs). We also handle securities arbitration claims before FINRA, AAA and other SROs. In addition, the group litigates commercial matters including employment disputes, trade secrets, bank litigation, and surety, fidelity and performance bonds.
 
Our offices are centrally linked by state-of-the-art computer networking. Our clients realize added value from our extensive network of offices: travel time is sharply reduced and the attorneys working out of these offices and living in these respective areas are intimately familiar with local practice and enjoy a good rapport with the judges before whom they frequently appear.
 
Recognizing the need for a cost-effective approach to the defense of professionals, our firm is dedicated to providing our clients with quality, timely and economical service. We are on the cutting edge in developing innovative and alternative billing practices.
 
The Professional Liability Practice Group serves clients in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Ft. Lauderdale and communities throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Florida and New York.
 
We would welcome the opportunity to work with you in handling your professional liability litigation. We are also available to conduct presentations or training seminars at your location, or at one of our eighteen offices. 

Case Study February 8, 2013

Pages

Jan 12, 2009
Attorneys obtained a defense verdict in a complex legal malpractice case. Plaintiff, an insurance agency, alleged that our attorney client failed to timely prosecute its third-party beneficiary contract claim against a reinsurer who allegedly put...
Dec 10, 2008
Attorney obtained a dismissal of a slander claim against the Board of Directors of an orthodox Jewish congregation. Defense attorney moved for a dismissal on the pleadings, arguing that the court's involvement in the case would violate the...
Dec 10, 2008
Attorney obtained summary judgment in a complex legal malpractice case involving a high value real estate deal. Defendant represented one of the buyers. After the deal fell through, defendant filed suit against the sellers and their attorneys, and...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorneys obtained summary judgment and dismissal with prejudice of a complex legal malpractice action. Plaintiff was the sole shareholder of a national trucking company that owned and/or leased approximately 300 trucks and employed over 75 full-...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorneys won summary judgment on all claims against a security company that employed a security guard in a public school. The security guard began a romantic and sexual relationship with a fourteen year old female student, culminating in the girl...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorneys succesffully defended an alleged legal malpractice action in which plaintiff filed suit against her former attorney, who had represented Plaintiff in several separate and distinct legal matters over the course of nearly two years,...
Sep 29, 2008
Attorney prevailed on a Rule 12 Motion, resulting in the dismissal of Plaintiffs' complaint against a mortgage broker. Plaintiffs were first-time home buyers and purchasers of new construction residential property. Plaintiffs claimed the mortgage...
Sep 22, 2008
Attorneys received a defense verdict in a binding, non-appealable, multi-day arbitration. Claimant alleged that a national broker dealer client defamed him by maliciously reporting the basis for his termination from the firm and sought a...
Sep 15, 2008
Attorneys obtained summary judgment dismissal of all counts and claims in a legal malpractice action where the plaintiff claimed her divorce attorney negligently failed to include a prayer for alimony in a motion for default judgment resolving all...
Jul 21, 2008
Attorneys received Summary Judgment for an insured in a seller's disclosure case on behalf of the home inspector on the basis of a specific one year statute of limitations in the home inspection law. Prior counsel had failed to plead any statue of...

Pages

Pages

Law Alerts April 11, 2013
In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiffs set forth a claim for breach of contract arising from an underlying stock purchase agreement, wherein the plaintiffs erroneously believed, based upon attorney-defendants' advice, that the sale..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Law Alerts April 11, 2013
The broker secured windstorm coverage for the condominium association through an insurance company. The association's condominium was damaged by hurricanes. It proceeded with expensive remediation efforts after the broker assured it that the..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Law Alerts April 11, 2013
In this legal malpractice action, the attorney-defendant appealed a jury verdict entered against her in favor of the plaintiff, her former client in underlying divorce and support proceedings. The plaintiff alleged that the attorney-defendant failed..., Case Law Alerts - 2nd Quarter 2013
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2013
By Nicole M. Ehrhart, Esq.*   Key Points: Superior Court expands damages in legal malpractice actions in assumpsit. Potential damages now may include actual losses sustained.   Albeit in a non-precedential decision, the..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2013
By John L. Slimm, Esq.*   Key Points: Litigation privilege limited by New Jersey court. Litigation privilege does not apply to a client's malpractice claims against his/her attorney where it is claimed that the attorney..., Defense Digest, Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2013
Case Study February 8, 2013
Law Alerts January 24, 2013
On Friday, January 18, 2013, James E. Boasberg of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a Motion for Summary Judgment in which the Court ruled that the IRS lacks statutory authority to promulgate or enforce the new...
Law Alerts January 11, 2013
The plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed on a motion based upon her failure to produce expert opinion regarding the standard of professional care applicable to the defendants in the course of their representation of plaintiff in the purchase of..., Case Law Alert - 1st Quarter 2013
Law Alerts January 11, 2013
The plaintiff noticed an advertisement to invest in a real estate project located in Vietnam. The advertising newspaper and person introduced the plaintiff to two other co-investors and attorney Michael Song, Esq. for the purpose of his acting as..., Case Law Alert - 1st Quarter 2013
Law Alerts January 11, 2013
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff's, Buchanan, claim for malpractice against the attorneys who represented him in the underlying matter. Buchanan represented the Kerrs in filing for bankruptcy...., Case Law Alert - 1st Quarter 2013

Pages

Chair

Christopher E. Dougherty
Director - Professional Liability Department
(215) 575-2733
cedougherty@mdwcg.com

Please read the following disclaimer:

Thank you for your interest in our firm. The information contained on this Website contains statements, videos and other content about the type and quality of services offered by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, as well as past results and testimonials about the firm. This information has not been reviewed nor approved by the Florida Bar.

  • The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and/or testimonials have been provided.
  • All results of cases handled by the firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
  • The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by any individual attorney or by the firm nor of the experience of all clients or others with the firm. Every case is different, and each client's case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.


Please acknowledge that you have read the above disclaimer by clicking on one of the two links below.

YES I have read and understand the above statements. I am interested in learning more about Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. NO I do not want to view the information.

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."