Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

General Liability

The General Liability Practice Group of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin regularly litigates in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Florida and New York, defending insureds, insurance companies and self-insured entities.
 
The general liability practice area includes such diverse types of defense litigation as:

  • Owners and contractors protective liability
  • Owners, landlords and tenants coverage
  • Bailor/bailee
  • Premises liability
  • Assault and battery
  • Security
  • Commercial liability
  • Advertising injuries
  • Defamation
  • Privacy
  • Elevator incidents
  • False arrest
  • Malicious prosecution cases
  • First-party and third-party property damage cases
  • Fire legal liability litigation

 
We understand that every client is concerned with the extent of legal fees and costs incurred. Savings are achieved in a number of ways. With offices situated within a six-state region, we are able to provide our clients with defense attorneys who are close to and very familiar with the litigation forum. Secondly, we are cognizant of the need to deliver legal services in a prompt and efficient manner, coupled with considerable emphasis on being results-oriented.
 
We would welcome the opportunity to work with you in handling your general liability litigation and we are available to give presentations or conduct training seminars on general liability topics. We are also on the cutting edge of alternative fee arrangements in order to provide our clients with the highest level of services in the most cost-efficient and predictable manner possible.

Pages

Jun 1, 2010
Attorney received a defense verdict where Plaintiff had committed suicide by jumping from the sixth floor of a Hospital. The jury found no cause against our client, security services provider, notwithstanding plaintiffs' allegations that the...
Jun 1, 2010
Attorney obtained an order dismissing all counts against our client home owner in case where the plaintiff was shot in the head while on our insured's property. The court ruled, in essence, that because no special relationship existed between the...
Apr 26, 2010
Attorney obtained summary judgment on behalf of a vehicle services company in a quadriplegia claim. The company contracted with a Township to maintain township vehicles, including a bus used to transport senior citizens to a senior center. The...
Nov 18, 2009
Attorney won a binding ADR arbitration in which the plaintiff alleged that while dog sitting the client's Rottweiler, he was suddenly attacked and bitten on his face, resulting in a surgical reconstruction of his lip.  The attorney presented family...
Jun 16, 2009
Attorney recently won a lengthy jury trial in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.  The plaintiff, a 76 year old woman, was attacked by a pit bull, owned by the clients' daughter and family, who jumped over a fence onto the plaintiff's adjacent...
Mar 13, 2009
Attorneys obtained summary judgment on behalf of an international fraternity in a traumatic personal injury action. Two Plaintiffs suffered significant head traumas, skull and facial fractures as well significant cognitive loss when they were beaten...
Oct 27, 2008
Attorney obtained a defense verdict in a fire case after a week of trial on behalf of the company that serviced the restaurant's fire suppression system. Plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to maintain the fire suppression system in accordance...
Oct 20, 2008
Attorney achieved an appellate victory in a case involving claims ranging from property loss/damage, breach of contract, the malicious killing of a pet and punitive damages. A jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant after the Court...
Jul 21, 2008
Attorney obtained a defense verdict in favor of an insured in a "negligent hair cutting" case. Plaintiff claimed that he was cut while receiving a hair cut in defendant's salon and then subsequently developed MRSA. Defense attorneys successfully...
Jun 26, 2008
Attorney secured a summary judgment in a libel suit. Defendant, an oil distributor, ran two advertisements in a newspaper indicating that "discount oil companies" offer less than optimal service. The ads did not identify any particular "discount...

Pages

Pages

Defense Digest Article September 4, 2018
Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 2018 By Dean G. Aronin, Esq.* Key Points: New York plaintiffs are no longer required to prove the absence of comparative negligence as a prerequisite to obtaining partial summary judgment. The..., Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 2018. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...
Defense Digest Article September 4, 2018
Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 2018 By Matthew S. Schorr, Esq.* Marshall Dennehey’s Casualty Department is the largest of the firm’s four legal departments, comprising nearly half of our 500+ attorneys and 100+ paralegals....,     Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 2018. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not...
Defense Digest Article September 4, 2018
Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 2018 By Lisa M. Grubb, Esq.* Key Points: New Civil Rule of Procedure, Rule 16.1 calls for mandatory non-binding arbitration in civil actions meeting certain criterion and that are valued below $...,   Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 2018. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to...
Law Alerts July 1, 2018
In a decision issued the same date as Day v. Wilcox Landscaping, Inc., 2018 Del. LEXIS 187 (Del. May 2, 2018), the Delaware Supreme Court again rejected a plaintiff’s argument that a duty was owed to take preventative measures for snow or ice..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts July 1, 2018
Twenty-nine days after the plaintiff served a proposal for settlement, the defendant filed a motion for enlargement to respond, arguing she did not have the opportunity to review the offer in light of new medical information disclosed by the..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts July 1, 2018
The New York Court of Appeals decided “a question that has perplexed courts for some time.”; whether a plaintiff must show the absence of their own comparative negligence to obtain partial summary judgment on liability. The court held..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts July 1, 2018
The plaintiff slipped and fell during an ongoing snow storm. She sued, among others, the snow and ice contractor for the premises. She argued that the Continuing Storm Doctrine does not apply to independent contractors (the way it does to landowners..., Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2018
The New York Court of Appeals clarified prior opinions regarding disclosure of social media accounts in personal injury actions. Prior precedent stated a party must show that there was relevant material on the social media account by demonstrating..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2018
Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s finding that the insurer’s proposal for settlement was not made in good faith. The court found that the insurer had a reasonable basis to conclude its exposure..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Defense Digest Article March 1, 2018
Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 1, March 2018 By Alex K. Yoder, Esq.* Key Points: Amendment of original pleading to change the name of a defendant is now permitted after the expiration of statute of limitations for “mistake...., Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 1, March 2018. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended...

Pages

Chair

Howard P. Dwoskin
Director, Casualty Department
(215) 575-2664
hpdwoskin@mdwcg.com

Additional Contacts

Matthew S. Schorr
Assistant Director, Casualty Department
(973) 618-4155
msschorr@mdwcg.com

Related Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."