Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Asbestos and Mass Tort Litigation

Since the inception of toxic tort litigation, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin has been heavily involved in a wide variety of such matters, with a particular focus on the defense of asbestos claims and suits. Beginning in the mid-1970s, we represented Johns Manville Corporation, the largest manufacturer of asbestos products in North America, in all asbestos litigation in eastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey. When the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust was established in the late 1980s, we served as Northeast Region Consulting Counsel for the Trust.

The attorneys in our asbestos litigation practice group, residing in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, have defended a significant number of manufacturers, distributors, contractors and premises owners in thousands of asbestos personal injury claims brought against them. The majority of our attorneys who work in this practice group have in excess of 20 years of experience in toxic tort and mass tort litigation. Our trial team has tried hundreds of these claims to verdict and is the most experienced team in Philadelphia. This extensive trial experience has enabled our clients to secure outstanding results through both trials and settlements.

Recently, our asbestos litigation practice has significantly expanded its scope of representation with offices on Long Island, New York. The attorneys in our New York office represent clients in the New York courts, as well as numerous other jurisdictions throughout the country. Several of the newest members of this practice group serve as national counsel for their clients, serve on the New York Supreme Court's Asbestos Litigation Case Management Committee, and were founding members of the Joint Medical Defense Group, a cooperative group that shares responsibility for preparing medical defenses on common cases. Also, several of these attorneys act as liaison counsel in many of the New York City extremis clusters and are called upon by the court and Special Master to resolve disputes and to enable the extremis cases, which are prepared on a very short schedule, to proceed to trial as efficiently as possible.

An understandable concern of every client in significant environmental and toxic tort cases is the extent of legal fees and costs. Our firm began as an insurance defense firm and, although we have expanded our practice areas considerably, we have never lost our sensitivity to our clients' desire to control legal expenses. This is especially true in the environmental and toxic tort areas where multi-party, complex cases make control of expenses all the more important. We always handle cases with a practical, result-oriented approach, balancing strong representation of our clients with realistic cost containment. In addition to our fees being very competitive, we work with our clients to develop innovative, alternative approaches to normal file handling that result in considerable savings to our clients without sacrificing quality legal representation.

We welcome the opportunity to work with you in handling your asbestos litigation matters. We are also available to give presentations or to conduct training seminars on environmental and toxic tort topics at your location or ours.

Pages

Aug 30, 2017
Obtained a defense verdict after a two-week jury trial. ​The 64-year-old plaintiff contended that he developed asbestosis, which required him to use oxygen 24 hours a day, as a result of working with welding rods while working as a welder throughout...
Apr 21, 2016
Obtained summary judgment in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas in a premises liability case against our client, a manufacturer of forged steel wheels used in the railroad industry. The plaintiff alleged she was exposed to asbestos dust...
Jun 10, 2014
Obtained a defense verdict in a case tried over two weeks in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.  The plaintiff alleged her decedent husband, who died at the age of 77, contracted lung cancer as a result of being exposed to asbestos...
May 16, 2013
Successful summary judgment in an asbestos case in Delaware. The court agreed with the our argument that there was insufficient evidence (1) that the plaintiffs worked with the equipment containing asbestos and that (2) the identified equipment...
Mar 1, 2012
We convinced the court that, under Pennsylvania law, our client had no duty to the spouse of an employee who was exposed to asbestos by washing her husband's clothes and who developed mesothelioma. Plaintiff's demand had been over $3 million...
Nov 22, 2010
Attorney obtained a defense verdict in a 10 day trial in which plaintiff’s estate sought for wrongful death, claiming that his esophageal cancer was related to asbestos exposure. Although it was conceded that plaintiff had objective evidence of...
Jun 28, 2010
Attorneys' received a motion for summary judgment in the representation of a construction company in a suit where plaintiff/decedent and his estate sued the construction company as well as a number of contractors, sub-contractors, manufacturers, and...
Jun 28, 2010
Attorneys obtained defense verdicts in cases tried in All issues format, where the jury found that the Decedent-Plaintiffs' lung cancers were not a result of exposure to any asbestos from the defendants' asbestos-containing welding rods.
Jun 28, 2010
Attorneys' obtained a defense Verdict in second phase of reverse bifurcated trial. The jury found during the first phase of the trial that Plaintiff's lung cancer was caused by his exposure to asbestos and awarded damages. In the second phase of...
Jun 28, 2010
Attorney received a defense verdict in case tried in reverse bifurcated format. After the first phase of the trial, the jury found that Decedent-Plaintiff's lung cancer was not caused by exposure to asbestos.

Pages

Pages

Law Alerts December 1, 2016
Edited by Timothy D. Rau, Esq. Cumulative Exposure Opinions Admissible Under Betz by Carolyn Schweizer On November 22, 2016, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an opinion in Rost v.Ford Motor Company in which it declined to expand its..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2016
By Melissa D. Cochran, Esq.* Key Points: The “bare metal” defense is the theory that a product manufacturer cannot be held liable for alleged harms caused by asbestos component parts used with its product when it did not...,   Defense Digest, Vol. 22, No. 3, September 2016. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to...
Law Alerts December 2, 2015
Edited by Timothy D. Rau, Esquire Philly Jury Awards $1.7 Million Against Employer for Mesothelioma by Joshua Scheets In the first verdict against an employer in connection with an asbestos personal injury suit brought on behalf of a former..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...
Defense Digest Article December 1, 2015
By Robyn A. Shelton, Esq.*   Key Points: Sterling reinforces that even claims of direct exposure do not meet Pennsylvania’s standard without evidence of frequent and regular contact with the defendant’s product. Co-..., Defense Digest, Vol 21, No. 4, December 2015 Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...
Defense Digest Article December 1, 2015
By Daniel J. Ryan, Jr., Esq.* Litigation related to asbestos injuries is one of the longest-running mass torts in United States history. Marshall Dennehey’s Asbestos and Mass Tort Litigation Practice Group has been involved since a flood of..., Defense Digest, Vol 21, No. 4, December 2015 Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...
Law Alerts September 3, 2015
Edited by Timothy D. Rau, Esquire Double recoveries in asbestos litigation, from both bankruptcy trusts and tort litigation, are under increased scrutiny by the judicial system. In this special report from Mealey's Asbestos Bankruptcy Report,..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...

Pages

January 5, 2017
Tiffany J. Giangiulio, Esq., has joined the Philadelphia office of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin as a shareholder in the firm's Casualty Department. Ms. Giangiulio concentrates her practice in the areas of asbestos and mass tort, environmental and toxic tort, and product liability...
August 13, 2015
Armand J. Della Porta, Jr., shareholder in the Wilmington office of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, has been appointed Atlantic Regional Director of the Defense Research Institute (DRI), the country's leading organization of defense attorneys and in-house counsel. Mr. Della Porta,...
May 16, 2013
John Hare, Chairman of the Post-Trial and Appellate Advocacy Practice Group at Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, testified in April before the Pennsylvania Legislature in support of a bill he co-drafted that seeks transparency in the process by which claimants seek compensation from...
October 1, 2011
We're growing . . .On October 1, 2011, Marshall Dennehey expanded its asbestos litigation practice in depth and geographic footprint with the addition of six attorneys and the opening of an office in the heart of Long Island. Four will reside in our new office in Hauppauge, New York, and two in our...

Chair

Daniel J. Ryan Jr.
Co-Chair, Environmental & Toxic Tort Practice Group
(215) 575-2740
djryan@mdwcg.com

Co-Chair

Michael L. Turner
Shareholder
(215) 575-2644
mlturner@mdwcg.com

Related Practice Areas

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."