Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., Jan 18, 2019
End Date
E.g., Jan 18, 2019
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts April 1, 2011
Following a jury trial on the plaintiff's NJLAD claim alleging gender discrimination, the jury found for the plaintiff on her claim of discrimination, but rejected her claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress and also rejected her claim..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
In Garner, the complainant alleged that he was terminated by his former employer because of his race, alleging that similarly-situated employees of a different race were not terminated for a violation of the company's policy when he was..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The claimant sustained a work-related injury on January 31, 2003. Thereafter, the claimant received workers' compensation benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable (NCP) issued by the employer. The NCP described the work injury as a...
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
Guest passengers who have their own policies of UM/UIM coverage do not qualify as insureds under UM/UIM coverage of the policy covering the vehicle in which they are passengers. Definitional clauses excluding guest passengers with their own UM/UIM..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
In Thompson, the plaintiff sought protection from Title VII's anti-retaliation provision after his employment was terminated, arguing that the employer terminated his employment because his fiancée filed a complaint of discrimination..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
Insurer sought to discover the entire contents of the insureds' attorney's file, excluding attorney-client privileged communications, in an underlying UIM claim to determine whether the insureds acted in good faith. The insurer argued that the..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
In a Per Curiam decision, which was not approved for publication, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division recently reversed a trial court's order dismissing several Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”) claims against the developer..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
Following the claimant's work injury, the employer requested an Impairment Rating Examination (IRE) within the time frame that would allow the employer to obtain self-executing relief. The results of the evaluation were that the claimant had a 13%...
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The Appellate Division concluded that judicial review of an intermediate ruling is not one of the APDRA procedures the Commissioner has made "applicable" to PIP arbitration proceedings. In further support of this position, the Appellate Division..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The claimant, who received 500 weeks of partial disability benefits for coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, petitioned for total disability benefits, which were granted by the workers' compensation judge on the basis of the claimant’s medical evidence. On...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."