Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., Apr 19, 2018
End Date
E.g., Apr 19, 2018
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The petitioner, a tree service technician, was a full-time employee of a tree service company who occasionally did subcontracting work for the respondent. During a long period of time during which the employer had no work, the petitioner solicited..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
In Sencherey, the plaintiff initially pursued remedies at the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, alleging that her separation from employment—which occurred as a result of the plaintiff’s failure to return to work after having..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
On February 4, 1999, the petitioner, the director of construction for the respondent, was seriously injured when he was involved in a motor vehicle accident which occurred during the course of his employment. As a result of this accident, he...
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The entire-controversy doctrine does not require a client to assert legal malpractice claims against his or her attorney in an action which arose from the attorney's alleged negligent advice, even though the attorney has been made a party to that..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
A claim and penalty petition were denied by the workers' compensation judge and affirmed by the Appeal Board and Commonwealth Court. The workers' compensation judge had found that the claimant failed to establish through substantial, credible...
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The plaintiff injured his hand while in the course and scope of his employment with C..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
On Monday, November 15, 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its decision in this controversial case. The issue in Dean was whether the economic loss doctrine, a judicial construct which bars recovery in tort for damage a product causes only to..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The plaintiff sued her employer, alleging a hostile work environment based upon gender and retaliation in violation of the NJLAD. The trial judge dismissed the claim based upon a finding that the employer had in place a comprehensive anti-harassment..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
Federal courts use a two-part analysis when considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion: (1) separating facts averred from legal conclusions asserted and (2) whether the facts alleged are sufficient to show a plausible claim for relief. Bad faith claims..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2011
Law Alerts April 1, 2011
The claimant, an investigator for the Pennsylvania State Police, was involved in homicide investigations by providing forensic and photographic services. One case he investigated (“Baby Jane Doe”) involved a baby girl found in a plastic big near a...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."