Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., 2017-09-22
End Date
E.g., 2017-09-22
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts October 1, 2017
The claimant alleged multiple injuries in a work-related motor vehicle accident. While this claim petition was pending, he entered into a settlement agreement with a third party to resolve his auto case for $15,000. After attorney’s fees and..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Law Alerts October 1, 2017
An insured settled her bodily injury claim against a tortfeasor and signed a general release in which she agreed to release “any and all other persons or entities whatsoever” from claims arising from the accident. The court agreed with..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Law Alerts October 1, 2017
When bringing a loss of earning capacity claim, the burden is on the plaintiff to establish, with reasonable certainty, that the capacity to labor has been diminished and to provide a monetary standard to which a jury can measure future loss. While..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Law Alerts October 1, 2017
In 2014, the Florida Supreme Court held that caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice actions violate the equal protection clause and are unconstitutional. Estate of McCall v. United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). However, that...,   Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide...
Law Alerts October 1, 2017
As to the testimony of the petitioner’s and the respondent’s medical experts, the Judge of Compensation found that, despite a finding of over 100 percent disability on a combined basis, the petitioner’s expert’s report..., Case Law Alerts, 4th Quarter, October 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
What's Hot in Worker's Comp September 12, 2017
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2017
Defense Digest, Vol. 23, No. 3, September 2017 By Robert W. Stanko, Esq.* Key Points: Challenges to jurisdiction present difficulties for large, corporate defendants. U.S. Supreme Court has recently provided guidance relating to..., Defense Digest, Vol. 23, No. 3, September 2017. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not...
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2017
Defense Digest, Vol. 23, No. 3, September 2017 By April L. Cressler, Esq.* Key Points: You do have the right to record police officers engaged in official activity regardless of whether your actions constitute expressive conduct. The..., Defense Digest, Vol. 23, No. 3, September 2017. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."