Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., Dec 13, 2017
End Date
E.g., Dec 13, 2017
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Defense Digest Article September 1, 2009
New Jersey -- Workers' Compensation , Arguably, the most litigated issue in New Jersey workers' compensation court is whether additional permanent disability is caused by a petitioner's continued employment or by the natural progression of an earlier work-related accident. The..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2009
Marshall Dennehey's Amusements, Sports & Entertainment Practice Group is nationally recognized for our depth and experience in a wide range of amusement, sports and leisure risks, including sports and amusement facilities, arenas and concert..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009
Defense Digest Article September 1, 2009
Chuck Craven (Philadelphia, PA) succeeded in persuading the Pennsylvania Superior Court to unanimously affirm the dismissal of the plaintiffs' complaint on preliminary objections in Baker v. Pocono Mountain Chamber of Commerce (No. 1636 EDA 2008..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
Casualty Brad Remick and Alex Norman (Philadelphia, PA) obtained a unanimous defense verdict in a products liability case before Judge Louis Pollak in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff claimed that a pneumatic nailer was defective..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
Pennsylvalnia - Suit Limitation Clauses , In the recent Pennsylvania Superior Court decision in Prime Medica Assocs. v. Valley Forge Ins. Co., 2009 Pa. Super. 39, __ A.2d __ (Mar. 5, 2009), Pennsylvania's intermediate appellate court overturned a damage award in favor of an insured in..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
New Jersey - Health Care Liability (Affidavit of Merit) , In 2003 the New Jersey Supreme Court decided Ferreira v. Rancocas Orthopedic Assocs., 178 N.J. 144 (N.J. 2003), which has resulted in the withering of the chances of success on an affidavit of merit motion in situations where the plaintiff has..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
Pennsylvania -- Health Care Liability , Section 512 of the Pennsylvania Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act (MCARE) was recently at issue before the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in the case of Gbur v. Golio, 963 A.2d 443 (Pa. 2009), in which the Court affirmed the trial..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
Federal - Premises Liability (Snow & Ice Removal) , In many of the United States, snowfall generally occurs during the winter months. Despite warnings from public safety officials, people travel in snow storms to transact business they deem necessary or desirable. They may slip, fall, and injure..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
Pennsylvania -- Insurance Coverage & Bad Faith , In Jurinko v. Medical Protective et al., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26263, Nos. 06-3519 & 06-3666 (Dec. 24, 2008), on appeal to the Third Circuit, there was an issue regarding whether an insurer acted in bad faith by having two separate insureds..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009
Defense Digest Article June 1, 2009
In preparing to deliver my message, I thought it important to advise the readers of this publication about the firm's commitment to our Diversity Program. However, as I began drafting this article, it occurred to me that who better to author..., Defense Digest, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2009

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."