Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure

Practice Area Articles

Start Date
E.g., 2017-04-25
End Date
E.g., 2017-04-25
State
Author
Practice Area
Keyword
Article Category

Pages

Law Alerts April 11, 2017
Restoration Versus Remediation By Lila Wynne, Esq. Recently, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), its commissioner and the administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund sought both damages in the form of..., Private Parties Left Holding the Bag When It Comes to Pre-1977 Contamination By Kevin T. Bright, Esq. The New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11, et seq., provides a comprehensive mechanism for allocating financial..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a...
What's Hot in Worker's Comp April 6, 2017
Law Alerts April 1, 2017
The mother, who had custody of children, sought to keep the father from his son’s little league games due to inappropriate and public “criticism and disparagement” of the coach’s decisions. The court held that developing..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2017
The matter arises from a case filed by the plaintiff against ABF Freight Systems for the theft of Starboard’s high-value watches and jewelry from ABF’s warehouse. Starboard brought an action in state court against ABF and subsequently..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2017
The Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s disability discrimination claim, finding that the district court correctly determined that the plaintiff failed to satisfy her burden of establishing that she was disabled pursuant to..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2017
The plaintiff was injured on the defendant’s property when another person fell on top of her, apparently because the chair portion of the person’s bar stool separated from the seat portion. The plaintiff did not retain a liability expert..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...
Law Alerts April 1, 2017
The appellate division held that a retailer was entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiff could not identify the cause of her fall without engaging in speculation. The defendant pointed to testimony from the plaintiff that she was not sure..., Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2017 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."