Attorney won a contested motion for summary judgment, in a case in which the plaintiff/son brought suit against his mother, a large insurance company's insured, on the theory that she was negligent for failing to timely take her anti-seizure medication  The son was visiting his mother in her home, and she went upstairs to get her meds, which she had forgotten to take.  The son went partially up the stairs to the second floor to check on her and, as he did so, the mother was on her way down and allegedly had a seizure.  As a result, she fell on top of the son, cause him to sustain knee and wrist injuries, both requiring surgical procedures.  The defense neurologist, opined that failure to take a single dose of Topiramate, her prescribed anti-seizure medication, would not necessarily cause a seizure due to its lengthy half-life, and that even if the mother had timely ingested the Topiramate, there was no guarantee that a seizure would not occur.  The attorney further argued that the occurrence of a seizure requires expert opinion, which plaintiff's counsel failed to provide.  Lastly, the attorney argued that the event at issue was not reasonably foreseeable, thus negating an essential element of negligence.