Attorney prevailed on summary judgment on behalf of a School District and one of the District's former principals

Attorney prevailed on summary judgment on behalf of a School District and one of the District's former principals.  The plaintiff, a parent of a student in the District, claimed the former principal unlawfully eavesdropped on a telephone conversation between plaintiff and his son (then a 7th grader) in violation of the Federal Wiretapping Act, the Pennsylvania Wiretap Act and the 4th Amendment.  (Plaintiff previously had asserted more than a dozen other claims under federal and state law against the District and District personnel, all of which were successfully challenged and dismissed on Rule 12 motions).  The court concluded that plaintiff failed to establish the former principal unlawfully intercepted the telephone call in question, or that the former principal invaded any reasonable expectation of privacy that either plaintiff or his son may have had in the telephone call, which was taken by the student in the Middle School's offices on a District telephone.