Attorney obtained summary judgment

Attorney obtained summary judgment.  Plaintiff had alleged that our Police Officer had used excessive force in taking Plaintiff into custody following his arrest for driving under the influence, which had resulted in an accident.  Plaintiff argued that it was his handcuffing, and not the force of the crash, that caused an injury to his shoulder. The attorney was able to establish that Plaintiff had told four different versions of how he was injured, including contradictory versions told to his insurer, under penalty of perjury, in which he alleged he was injured in the crash, in his deposition, where he said he was injured at the scene of the crash when he was handcuffed, and to his wife, who he told he was injured at the hospital when removed from the police car.  The Court agreed with the defense argument that no reasonable juror could find in Plaintiff's favor, as a material issue of fact cannot be created by plaintiff's own conflicting accounts.