Attorney obtained dismissal of plaintiff PIP carrier's PIP reimbursement claim against the defendant Maryland insurance carrier because (1) the court lacked in personam jurisdiction over this particular defendant insurer because the insurer lacked the necessary minimum contacts with the state; (2) the insurer was a public agency under the laws of its home state; (3) as a public agency of that state, the insurer was entitled to sovereign immunity; and (4) the doctrines of comity and full, faith and credit warranted that the court respect and defer to that state's law and recognize the defendant carrier's entitlement to immunity from the plaintiff's PIP reimbursement claim.