Attorney obtained a defense verdict in a two week medical malpractice jury trial on behalf of defendant hospital where plaintiffs alleged the failure to diagnose and treat a pulmonary embolism in a 32 year old patient

Attorney obtained a defense verdict in a two week medical malpractice jury trial on behalf of defendant hospital where plaintiffs alleged the failure to diagnose and treat a pulmonary embolism in a 32 year old patient. The primary issue in the case involved the application of the Differing Schools of Thought Doctrine in the charge to the jury as it related to the administration of heparin, an anticoagulant.