Advertising Disclosure Email Disclosure
State
Practice Department
Practice Area
Start Date
E.g., Apr, 2018
End Date
E.g., Apr, 2018
Keyword

Pages

Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation January 19, 2018
According to the Commonwealth Court’s analysis, the decedent, as manager for one of the employer’s many locations, was a stationary employee as to that store. However, the court found that the decedent was not a stationary employee with..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
New York Automobile Liability January 19, 2018
The plaintiff argued the defendant suddenly stopped, whereas the defendant argued he slowed down at a reasonable rate when approaching the intersection. The end result was a rear-rend collision. The court found that, regardless of the dispute as to..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Pennsylvania Health Care Liability January 19, 2018
The plaintiff’s allegation was not that the cardiologist failed to properly interpret the echocardiogram or made any misdiagnoses of the plaintiff’s condition. Rather, the allegation was that the cardiologist failed to timely return the..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
New Jersey Automobile Liability January 19, 2018
In this case of first impression, a Virginia resident was struck by a New Jersey driver while walking across the street in New Jersey. The pedestrian wanted the Deemer Statute applied, which would furnish her with New Jersey’s PIP benefits,..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Florida Architectural, Engineering and Construction Defect Litigation January 19, 2018
Brought up on appeal to the Florida Supreme Court was the issue of whether a pre-suit Chapter 558 Notice in a construction defect matter qualifies as a "suit" under the CGL policy. Under the applicable policy, a "suit" would..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Federal Privacy and Data Security January 19, 2018
OSU Center for Health Sciences Announces Fourth Largest Health Care Breach of 2017 By David J. Shannon, Esquire The Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (OSU-CHS) just publicly announced a November 2017 data breach that resulted..., The material in this law alert has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific...
New Jersey Architectural, Engineering and Construction Defect Litigation January 19, 2018
The “last-pull” of the continuous trigger for purposes of determining an “occurrence” happens when the “essential nature and scope of the property damage first becomes known, or when one would have sufficient reason to..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Delaware Automobile Liability January 19, 2018
In his suit against his auto insurance carrier to recover uninsured motorist benefits, the plaintiff claimed that alleged debris in the roadway caused his vehicle to spin out of control and strike two other vehicles. His carrier argued there was no..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Florida Employment Law January 19, 2018
The employer filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against a former employee for violating his written non-compete agreement. After conducting a lengthy evidentiary hearing, the trial court granted the employer's motion and requested both..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...
Delaware Automobile Liability January 19, 2018
The plaintiff testified that her vehicle was struck twice from behind. The driver of the vehicle directly behind hers testified that he was at a complete stop when he was rear-ended and pushed into the plaintiff’s vehicle. The driver of the..., Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2018 Case Law Alerts is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal...

Pages

Before you send this email please note:

You are attempting to send email, through a link on our website, to an attorney of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin or an employee in our firm. Please note that your email may not be treated as confidential and does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon the transmission of an email through this website if you are seeking to enter into such a relationship. Until such time as we have agreed to represent you, no information in your email will be treated as confidential. Please contact us directly by telephone at 1.800.220.3308 if it is your intent to seek legal counsel with our firm or convey confidential information.

If it is still your intent to send this email, knowing that it may not be treated as confidential, you may accept our terms of agreement by pressing "OK". If you choose not to accept these terms of agreement you may navigate away from this page by pressing "Cancel."